top of page

Unit 7: Assessment and Learning Models

Learning Model
Utilizing Project-Based Learning (PBL), with a strong emphasis on Problem-Based Learning.

Background
This assignment comes at the perfect time, as I was recently assigned to oversee a Division Advisory Group. It's a group of mid-level managers within the organization, led by a core group of managers who have graduated from a Marine Corps Community Services (MCCS)- sponsored course at UNC-Chapel Hill, as a means to empower managers at all levels. A couple of weeks ago, 
Gears.png
The group conducted a brainstorming session, using a Gallery Walk to address the topics: Bottlenecks, Processes to Start/Keep/Stop, and Innovative Communication. Among the trends identified, one of the largest was the organization's onboarding program for new managers. This leads to my PBL learning activity. 

Scenario
1.) Present the core group with the question, "Given the identified shortfalls of the current onboarding program, how do we improve the current onboarding process for managers to fully prepare them for their role with MCCS?" The end-state is to create a revised, organizational-level policy for new managers. 

Note: Subsequent PBL activities will involve further developing onboarding programs for the subordinate-level divisions within the organization. 

2.) Learning Outcomes: 
  • Inspect the current onboarding program
  • Identify both federal and organizational onboarding requirements
  • ​Diagram the onboarding process
  • Examine necessary administrative tasks from unnecessary ones
  • Determine necessary acculturation information
  • Identify required assets needed
  • Diagram the full onboarding process   
  • Test the effectiveness of the new onboarding process

3.) Project Structure:
  • Outline the Plan of Action and Milestones (POA&M), to include primary task, subordinate tasks (that feed into the primary task, suspense dates, responsible members, and supporting agencies.
  • Create the groups (a mix of Core Managers and other mid-level managers)
  • Identify the roles and responsibilities for each group member
Note: Because an underlying goal of the Division Advisory Group is empowerment, the structure will not be created for the members but co-created, using the educator (myself and one other facilitator) for guidance, cultivate collaboration, and assist with conflict resolution. 

4.) Employ scaffolding by promoting the following questions to the learners:
  • What can I achieve or find on my own?
  • When do I need to rely on my peers and Core Mangers?
  • What information do I need to seek from subject-matter experts
  • What will need to be elevated to the facilitators (as a last-result)

5.) Throughout the learning process, the facilitators will incorporate feedback and reflection, creating opportunities for learners to explore what they've learned, what challenges they face, and how they are working, or have resolved) problems. 

6.) The end product, a newly revised policy to be reviewed and approved by the Assistant Chief of Staff and, once published, will be showcased at the next Employee of the Quarter event. 

 
Diagnostic Assessment
Utilize surveys to gauge the learners' existing experience with the onboarding process, to include the recency of their onboarding, the number of managers they've onboarded, etc. An online quiz will assess learners' prior knowledge of the learning outcomes. This will help balance the groups and identify the appropriate scaffolding techniques to determine each learner's Zone of Proximal Development, maximizing the learner's potential and helping them become independent.

Formative Assessment
Periodically reviewing the POA&M, using reflective questioning, and facilitating group discussions on Microsoft Teams are informal methods to assess knowledge acquisition throughout the process. The POA&M outlines the way ahead and creates touchpoints for learners to evaluate their progress. Reflective questioning and group discussions provide opportunities for learners to engage with their peers, allowing them to both offer and receive valuable feedback. These engagements also give facilitators the ability to gradually relinquish control to the group, enabling greater autonomy. 

Summative Assessment
The final project, the revised policy, will be assessed during the routing process. This includes reviews by the Human Resources, Operations, Administrative, and Legal Divisions within MCCS. Having the project reviewed by subject-matter experts has renewed learners' confidence in the feedback provided. These subject matter experts will serve as a valued resource throughout the project, so their endorsement is more likely and will provide learners with confidence. 

Authentic Assessment
The learning objectives have been identified and can be expanded as learners engage in the process. The relevant tasks will be outlined in the POA&M, which the learners will also create and adjust. The assessment tool is simply the various references the reviewing agencies will use in their assessment. By being actively involved in all facets of the project, including the learning process structure, learners are more likely to replicate the methods and use the resources independently in future projects. 
Graduate cap.png
Connection to Learning Theory
​This activity is driven primarily by Connectivist Learning Theory and Andragogy. Some of the eight principles of connectivism include using diverse opinions and allowing learners to connect knowledge between different human and non-human resources. The learners not only gain the ability to judge information for credibility, accuracy, relevance, and recency for this PBL but also for future PBL's as well for a continuous process of improvement. A main component of this activity stems from Andragogy, including tying the learning process
to real-world problems, and is flexible to accommodate learners' busy schedules and competing requirements. It also builds on the learners' diverse experiences and pre-existing knowledge, capitalizes on their intrinsic need to solve a problem that effets them, and because they were part of the process to identify the issue, the "why" is already build into the process. With the POA&M broken into tasks and subtasks,  it breaks up the information for incremental learning. 
Gemini_Generated_Image_lvrngylvrngylvrn_
Artificial Intelligence Disclosure
I used Grammarly as a thought partner to assist with organization, spellchecking, and editing for clarity. All final ideas, content, and analysis are my own.  I used Gemini to generate graphics throughout my website. 

 Click Here For Additional Resources That Contributed To This Content

Authentic Assessment. (n.d.). New Jersey Institute of Technology.  https://www.njit.edu/ite/authentic-assessment

​

Bates, T. (2022). Teaching in a Digital Age: Third Edition. BC Campus https://ecampusontario.pressbooks.pub/gccomm/sectioninfo

​

Buljan, M. (2021, December 13). Experiential Learning in Online Courses. Ewyse. https://ewyse.agency/blog/experiential-learning-in-online-courses/

​

Buljan, M. (2025, October 2). Gamification For Learning: Strategies And Examples. eLearning Industry. https://elearningindustry.com/gamification-for-learning-strategies-and-examples

​

Diagnostic Assessments. (n.d.). Www.buffalo.eduhttps://www.buffalo.edu/catt/teach/develop/design/designing-assessments/diagnostic-assessments.html

​

Gamification. (2025, November 28). Reddit. https://www.reddit.com/r/gamification/

​

​Google. (2025). Gemini. https://gemini.google.com/app

​

Kahoot. (2024). Kahoot! Kahoot! https://kahoot.com/

​

‌ Karpicke, J. D. (2012). Retrieval-Based Learning: Active Retrieval Promotes Meaningful Learning. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 21(3), 157–163.

​

Northern Illinois University Center for Innovative Teaching and Learning. (2012). Formative and Summative Assessment. Northern Illinois University. https://www.niu.edu/citl/resources/guides/instructional-guide/formative-and-summative-assessment.shtml

​

Pappas. C. (2024, January 26). Diagnostic assessment in eLearning: What eLearning professionals should know. eLearning Industry. https://elearningindustry.com/diagnostic-assessment-in-elearning-what-elearning-professionals-should-know ‌

​

Shabatura, J. (2022, July 26). Using Bloom’s Taxonomy to Write Effective Learning Objectives. Uark.edu; University of Arkansas. https://tips.uark.edu/using-blooms-taxonomy/

​

‌ Sprouts. (2015, October 12). Experiential Learning: How We All Learn Naturally. [Video]. YouTube. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aF63HHVbpQ8&t=11s

​

Watson, E. (n.d.). Defining Assessment. University of Alberta Center for Teaching and Learning. https://www.ualberta.ca/centre-for-teaching-and-learning/media-library/teaching-institute/2019/assessment/defining-assessment-and-evaluation.pdf

​

Yale University. (2017). Formative & summative assessments. Poorvu Center for Teaching and Learning. https://poorvucenter.yale.edu/teaching/teaching-resource-library/formative-summative-assessments

Back To Top

bottom of page