top of page

Unit 3: Dick and Carey Design Model

The Dick and Carey Model, also known as the Systems Approach Model (Instruction Design Central, 2019), comprises 10 stages (Carrier, 2019) but is sometimes outlined as 9 stages, with "Revision" as an underlying stage throughout the process (Dick and Carey Model, 2018). It is a systematic approach that outlines the entire process for building an impactful learning experience (Pappas, 2024), with a strong emphasis on learner-centredness and outcomes.  "It views learning as a comprehensive system, rather than a variety of individual components" (Pappas, 2023b). â€‹â€‹â€‹â€‹â€‹â€‹â€‹â€‹

Conduct
Instructional
Analysis

Revise
Instruction

Identify
Instructional Goals

Write 
Performance
Objectives

Develop
Criterion
Reference
Test

Develop 
Instructional
Strategy

Select
Instructional
Material

Develop &
Conduct
Formative
Assessment

Identify 
Entry
Behaviors

Develop &
Conduct
Summative
Assessment

  1. Identify instructional goals by identifying the overarching goals that tie to real-world applications, describing the specific knowledge, skills, or attitudes (KSAs) the learner is expected to acquire. The instructional goals should be nested within the organization's strategic goals. â€‹â€‹â€‹â€‹â€‹â€‹â€‹â€‹

  2. Conduct an instructional analysis by analyzing the learners, environment, and determining the skills involved in achieving the learning goal. Also, identify if the instructional goal is linked to the psychomotor, affective, and/or cognitive domain(s). 

  3. Identify entry behaviors and Learner characteristics, such as preferences, motivation, and various traits, to narrow the path forward in creating the learning experience. Determine learners' prior knowledge to identify the learning gap.

  4. Write performance objectives by describing the task or process to be mastered and the criteria to gauge the learners' progress.  Transform the needs and goals into specific, measurable objectives. This includes the conditions, the behavior, and the criteria. 

  5. Develop criterion-reference test items by identifying the most suitable form of assessment, which is not only to assess the learner but also assess the learning design. 

  6. Develop an instructional strategy by considering the learning theories and models that best meet the learners' needs and fit with the subject matter of the learning experience. 

  7. Select instructional materials by choosing materials, tools, and exercises to achieve the learning goals. This includes creating content such as tutorials, branching scenarios, and engaging content. 

  8. Develop & conduct formative evaluations, both formal and/or informal, to assess how effectively the learning experience is expected to perform and is conducted during the learning experience.

  9. Develop & conduct summative evaluation(s) to be delivered at the end of the learning experience to assess the effectiveness, including learner satisfaction, KSA achievement, and organizational impact. 

  10. Revise instruction throughout the entire process, in a continuous cycle of review and revision. â€‹â€‹

Implications On Instructional (Learning) Design

The Dick and Carey Design Model takes a similar systematic approach as the ADDIE model, but with more front-end work in the analysis phase, and leads with defining the goals as the foundation for the rest of the process. It provides more detail in the stages and may be more beneficial for less experienced instructional designers. Prior to using this model, instructional (learning) designers should have the necessary tools and resources to adequately complete the analysis stages. Instructional (learning) designers should also ensure this goals-focused, outcomes-centric model is appropriate for the type of learning experience being created and aligns with organizational goals. â€‹â€‹â€‹â€‹â€‹One recommendation from Pappas (2023a) is to use branching scenarios as a "choose your own adventure" approach to boost interactivity, customize the learning experience to meet the learners' needs, and stress real-world benefits without real-world risk. This is one of many options to consider when working through this model. 

Strengths and Limitations

  • It is comprehensive and focuseson alignment between instructional goals, objectives, assessments, and strategy, an important strength for my mini-course

  • It is applicable to a wide range of content, so the process can be replicated for additional mini-courses

Gemini_Generated_Image_ldmxrnldmxrnldmx.png
Gemini_Generated_Image_eww0gpeww0gpeww0.png
  • The strong emphasis on front-end analysis requires extra effort and resources to set the stage for the overall process

  • Because of its thoroughness, it may not be as suitable for a mini-course as it would be for an entire series or larger course

  • It is a widely accepted model

  • It is iterative and allows for continuous improvement

  • It is outcomes-focused, which is similar to the organization the learning experience supports

  • ​​It may be an overly complex and lengthy process more suited to a formal instructional experience, whereas this mini-course more informal​

Artificial Intelligence Disclosure
I used Grammarly as a thought partner to assist with organization, spellchecking, and editing for clarity. All final ideas, content, and analysis are my own.  I used Gemini to generate graphics throughout my website. 

 Click Here For References and Additional Resources That Contributed To This Content

Carrier, J. (2019, August 3). The Dick and Carey Instructional Design Model - PeopleShift %. PeopleShift. https://people-shift.com/articles/dick-carey-instructional-design-model/

Chaparro, R. Reaves, M., Jagger, C. B., and Bunch, J. C. (2023, April 17). Instructional Design Using the Dick and Carey Systems Approach, Publication #AEC632. University of Florida. https://edis.ifas.ufl.edu/publication/WC294

​

Dick and Carey Model - InstructionalDesign.org. (2018, November 30). InstructionalDesign.org. https://www.instructionaldesign.org/models/dick_carey_model/#google_vignette

Instructional Design Central. (2019). Instructional Design Models. Instructional Design Central. https://www.instructionaldesigncentral.com/instructionaldesignmodels

Kurt, S. (2015, November 23). Dick and Carey Instructional Model. Educational Technology. https://educationaltechnology.net/dick-and-carey-instructional-model/

Pappas, C. (2023a, June 12). The Top 7 Benefits Of Using Branching Scenarios In eLearning. https://elearningindustry.com/the-top-7-benefits-of-using-branching-scenarios-in-elearning

​

Pappas, C. (2023b November 20). 9 Steps To Apply The Dick And Carey Model In eLearning. ELearning Industry; eLearning Industry. https://elearningindustry.com/9-steps-to-apply-the-dick-and-carey-model-in-elearning

Pappas, C. (2024, February 28). An In-Depth Analysis Of The Dick And Carey Model. ELearning Industry. https://elearningindustry.com/an-in-depth-analysis-of-the-dick-and-carey-model

​

University of Maryland Global Campus. (2024). Strengths and Limitations of Dick and Carey. Brightspace. https://leocontent.umgc.edu/content/umuc/tgs/ldtc/ldtc605/2262/unit-3-/strengths-and-limitations-of-dick-and-carey-.html?ou=1378426

Back To Top

bottom of page